| What I state is the general course instead of details within. 1. I agree that T.A.D are logical, ideal and desireble. However, desirebles are not necessarily fit for the time being. I am not convined that China is ready now. 2. I was aware it's not easy to comprehend. How we define run wild and breakdown? what is the criteria of the time frame involved? If it is a "breakdown" given preset subjective criteria, is this breakdown neccesarily a bad thing when we jump out of that time frame? An desirable outcome through our lens is necessarily a desirable outcome for the nonforeseeable future? Chasing the frontier of every single category of "social"scirence, you will inevitablely deal with fundamental laws of natural science, if you expect make a meaningful breakthrough. We are not the God to dictate that mankind social development path ought to be seperated from the undelying physical laws. The way how we organize our societies, how we see fit, desireble or enough balances, to an extent why given social phynominon happens (corrupted Manchu, authoritarian communist China, smoking-free Singapore, etc.), has nothing to do with subjectve judgement, but evereything to do with the natural path. We humans have not so much experienced but enough eagerness to correct the nature machine and shortcut the due course. It's a bold backfire caused by our limited knowledge, regardless of imminent outcome. The right way to see therefore, is not "what's wrong with China"?, because China is prefect although intolerable, as perfect as the nature - prefectly corrupted at the perfect time by the prefect regime. |
What's Wrong with China?