| There is a difference between the lunch and the protest. For the lunch to be listen by the restaurant, he can talk (not need to scream with them) and call the police to sort the true, or suit the restaurant to make justice happen, so he do not need to disturb people eating. For the Tibet and Human right in China, Chinese government do not want to discuss (Dalaali lamma has repeated dozen of time he do not seek independance, and ask to talk, what China refuse.... China promised to improve human right if he got the olympic but recently he make the repression stronger than before), and there is no pacific protestation possible in China (desmonstration are forbidden... in Tibet they still did it peacefully the 10th, 11th, 12th, got beaten by the police each time, then it turn as a violent riot the 13th), and there is no kind of Police or Justice to make the Human right respected in China, even if Chinese constitution say "The government protect and respect the human right" Thus many people believe that the only remining choice is to make noice, put pressure on the Chinese government. I personaly still oppose use the Olympic games to protest against the lack of human right in China, as most of Chinese people misunderstand them and see them as an attack to Chinese people when it is a way to try to improve the human right FOR the Chinese people. So I think as the consequence these demonstration increase the nationalism and the support to the Government.... the opposit of what is seek. |
Disturbed Lunch