<- Click to filter by commenter
| 8 |
Seat-Belt? Oh. No. Thanks! Princess Diana would have survived the Paris tunnel crash if she had worn her seatbelt. Of the four people in the car, only one survived: the bodyguard. He was the only person wearing a seatbelt! |
| 7 |
Going Back to Luoyang Dont believe that posting. It is a common Nigerian fraud and really disgusting that people post such rubbish on peoples blogs They just give Africa a worse name and really its bad enough already |
| 6 |
MSN.COM Offers 2G Storage? i wna msn address 2 bt we cnt all have r own way can we!!!! |
| 5 |
We Filled Our Lives But Lost Our Souls China is quickly becoming one of the most unequal countries in the world. And a lot of that is a consequence of governmental policy. The majority of the population is probably too worried about having a roof over their heads to have time to lament the loss of their souls. Those that do have the privilege, ironically, often don't. They're so busy adding to their riches and defending their bourgeois lifestyles to think about what really matters. After all, as the old Chinese saying goes, money is not part of our existence; you can't take it with you when you die. To make life better for others, on the other hand, even something as little as planting a tree, may well have a lasting impact. |
| 4 |
Jia You, Shanghai Metro! Boran, Chicago, NYC, and Paris are much better. Bluekite, you should know why people drive or take taxi. Try being a woman on Shanghai metro or bus and have your butt groped constantly. Until they put police and cameras everywhere and start beating up the perverts, there will be good reasons to take a taxi. Perverts love you environmentalists. |
| 3 |
Traveled to Beijing with China Eastern Airlines china eastern airlines - NOT RECOMMENDED www.ce-air.com cheap and nasty!!! |
| 2 |
SARS Pictures From Beijng and Shanghai Found this link with a SARS model calculation in easy maths: http://home.t-online.de/home/520023180824-0001/. Pretty scary though! |
| 1 |
Net Send - Yet Another Type of Spam It is good to see the message from Marketer. I thought I was the only one who thought in a similar manner. While I don't necessarily agree with how Marketer made his comments - the underlying theme I think is OK. NET SEND messenging is less intrusive than spam email advertising. The critical difference, as has been pointed out in the prior messages, is the ability to turn NET SEND off. This functionality should handle any of the anti-NET SEND objections. However, what I think should be discussed is the concept of WHY? - - Why did spamming become popular in the first place - why is NET SEND being used as a means of advertising? The answer is: IT WORKS!!! Quite frankly, I believe that many people who are upset with both spamming and NET SENDing are only upset because someone (other than themselves) came up with an idea and is making a profit at selling it...and they are not. If legitimate email advertising (not spamming) didn't work, then spamming would have never worked... NET SEND is simply an extension of legitimate email advertising. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH EMAIL ADVERTISING! I would love to hear responses from people who believe that email advertising is inappropriate...Most email advertising occurs on an opt-in basis only! There is no spamming. Yes, of course, some people take it too far and belong in the spamming category - however, I believe that the word "spam" is being applied too broadly. Opt-in email advertising is not only ethical but also appropriate for small business owners in today's internet society. I could go on for a while - but I think that my point has been made - IF YOU DON'T WANT TO RECEIVE THE MESSAGES - THEN TURN THE OPTION OFF. IT REALLY IS THAT SIMPLE! |